Almost every search for "Vincent Price net worth" is looking for one specific person: Vincent Leonard Price Jr., the American actor born on May 27, 1911, who died on October 25, 1993, in Los Angeles. He is the horror-film icon, the voice of Professor Ratigan in Disney's The Great Mouse Detective, and the narrator of Tim Burton's animated short Vincent. That is the subject of this article.
The confusion worth flagging upfront: there is a Wikipedia disambiguation page for "Vincent Price" because the name appears in other contexts entirely. Financial data sites like Benzinga also have a profile for a "Vincent P. Price" tied to SEC insider-trading data, which has nothing to do with the actor. If you land on a page about stock trades or corporate filings, you are in the wrong place. The actor Vincent Price left no publicly traded company footprint, so any net-worth source that mixes those profiles is unreliable.
On this site, the name Vincent shows up across many subjects, from athletes to musicians to figures in organized crime history. None of those are the Vincent Price covered here. The actor is the unmistakable one: a five-decade career in film, stage, radio, television, and voice work, ending with his death in 1993.
Understanding Price's net worth requires knowing what his career actually looked like, because his income came from genuinely different sources across different decades. He was not a one-genre actor.
Price started on stage and broke into Hollywood in the early 1940s, working at major studios during the studio-contract era. In that system, actors were typically paid flat weekly salaries rather than profit participation, which meant steady income but limited upside. His most commercially recognizable phase came in the 1950s and 1960s through a string of horror and Gothic fantasy films, many produced by American International Pictures (AIP), including Roger Corman's Edgar Allan Poe adaptations. These films were low-budget by Hollywood standards but enormously profitable, and Price became their marquee name.
Beyond film, Price had consistent television work, extensive stage appearances, and a legitimate second career as an art expert and cookbook author. His art writing and association with the Sears Vincent Price Collection (a program that brought affordable fine art prints to middle-class American homes) was a real commercial venture in the 1960s. This is relevant because it represents an income stream that most horror-actor biographies overlook when estimating total wealth.
In his later years, he leaned into voice and narration work. The 1982 Tim Burton short Vincent used his voice to great effect. In 1986, Disney cast him as the villain Professor Ratigan in The Great Mouse Detective. That same period included his iconic spoken-word contribution to Michael Jackson's Thriller (1982), one of the best-selling albums in history. Voice work of that kind typically generates residuals that continue after the actor's death, which can be relevant to estate valuations.
By the time he died in 1993 from lung cancer, Price had an estimated filmography of well over 100 feature films plus extensive theater, radio, and TV credits, all documented in the List of Vincent Price Works. His personal papers, including materials related to specific film contracts and theater engagements, are archived at the Library of Congress, and an oral history interview from August 1992 (just over a year before his death) is held at the Smithsonian's Archives of American Art.
The most commonly cited figure is approximately $5 million at the time of his death in 1993. If you are also searching for Vincent Summa, its net worth figures are typically discussed separately from Vincent Price’s 1993 estimate vincent summa net worth. If you are comparing figures, focus on the sources that specifically cover Vincent Price rather than name-similar profiles Vincent Price’s 1993 estimate. For more detail on how these figures are typically presented, see the full explanation of Vincent Price net worth $5 million. Sites like CelebrityNetWorth and several entertainment aggregators repeat this number, and it has become the de facto standard estimate across the web.
To put $5 million in 1993 in context, that is roughly equivalent to $10-11 million in 2026 dollars, adjusting for inflation. For a performer with a 50-plus-year career spanning major studios, stage, television, bestselling voice work, and commercial ventures, this is a plausible but not extravagant figure. It suggests a comfortable, well-established career rather than blockbuster-star wealth.
Why is the figure not higher? A few reasons. Studio-era contracts typically did not include backend participation or profit sharing. The AIP horror films were profitable for the studios but not structured to make their stars wealthy from box office. Price also spent considerably on his art collection over decades, which may have been an asset or a drain depending on market timing. And like many entertainers who worked primarily as a "character star" rather than a top-tier marquee lead, his per-film fees were substantial but not in the same range as the biggest names of his era.
The honest answer is that the $5 million figure is a secondary-source consensus, not a probate-documented number. No widely available public record confirms the precise estate value. The estimate is informed by career earnings inference, known commercial activities, and biographical context, not by a court filing or audited estate accounting.
Net worth estimates for historical entertainers like Price are constructed from a combination of sources, and it helps to understand the hierarchy of reliability.
The reason figures vary across sites is mostly that each site applies different assumptions about salary levels, residual income, real estate holdings, and spending. None of them are working from a single authoritative document. When multiple sites converge on $5 million, it usually means they are referencing each other, not independently confirming the same number.
Price died at his home in Los Angeles on October 25, 1993. He had been in poor health in his final years, which is relevant because late-career health issues often affect earning capacity and can accelerate asset liquidation or estate planning.
What is documented or reasonably inferred about his financial position at death:
The Library of Congress holding of his papers is the most significant untapped source for a more precise financial picture. A researcher willing to work through that archive might find contracts, royalty statements, or correspondence that would either confirm or revise the $5 million consensus estimate significantly.
| Data point | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Net worth at death (1993) | Estimated: ~$5 million | Secondary-source consensus; no public probate record |
| Inflation-adjusted value (2026) | Approximately $10–11 million | Based on CPI adjustment from 1993 |
| Career earnings basis | Inferred from filmography + known projects | 500+ credits across film, TV, stage, voice |
| Art collection value | Unknown | Documented collector; no public appraisal found |
| Residual income at death | Likely active | Thriller narration and Disney Great Mouse Detective still in circulation |
| Primary documents (contracts, estate) | Archived but not publicly digitized | Vincent Price Papers at Library of Congress |
| Oral history financial statements | Qualitative only | 1992 Smithsonian interview; not a financial disclosure |
If you want to go beyond the standard $5 million figure and check it yourself, here is what I would actually do.
First, anchor every claim to a specific date. "Net worth at death in 1993" is a different question from "what his estate was worth in 2010" or "what his estate generates today from residuals." A reputable source will specify the date. If a page just says "Vincent Price's net worth is $X" without a year or context, treat that as a weak signal.
Second, check whether the source explains its methodology. Does it reference a biography, a probate record, a career earnings calculation, or any specific evidence? If the page has a number and no explanation of where it came from, it is almost certainly recycling another site's estimate.
Third, watch for the SEC/financial-data confusion. If you search for Vincent Price net worth and get results about stock trades, insider purchases, or corporate filings, you are looking at a completely different person (likely a business executive with the same name). The actor had no publicly traded company involvement.
Fourth, if you want the most grounded possible estimate, the place to start is the Library of Congress finding aid for the Vincent Price Papers. The collection includes project files, correspondence, and materials related to his film and theater work. That is where actual contract and payment documentation would live, if it has been preserved and accessioned. When you see a specific number, it helps to compare it against other sources that discuss Vincent delie net worth and how they arrive at that figure.
Finally, cross-reference a minimum of three sources before treating any figure as reliable. If all three say $5 million but none of them cite a primary document, you have three sites repeating one guess, not three independent confirmations. That is useful information: it tells you the $5 million figure is the established consensus, but also that no one has definitively proven it from primary records.
For context on how other Vincents in entertainment compare, this site covers figures like Vincent Young (the NFL quarterback), Gabe Vincent (NBA player), and others across sports and entertainment. For a different angle on how net-worth articles treat similarly named athletes, you might also check gabe vincent net worth as a comparison point. If you are looking for the specific figure behind Vincent Young net worth, you should verify it against sources that explain their methodology and date assumptions. Their wealth profiles are built from different income structures entirely, which is a useful reminder that the word "Vincent" covers an enormous range of careers and financial situations. Vincent Price the actor is in a category of his own: a golden-era Hollywood performer with a uniquely diverse career, whose wealth reflects both the limitations of the studio system and the longevity of a genuinely beloved cultural footprint.
Most $5 million net worth figures generally treat those ventures as part of his broader earnings, but they rarely break out revenue by source (film fees vs. publishing vs. art-related income). To confirm whether a specific estimate includes it, look for a methodology section that mentions publishing royalties, art print program participation, or the Sears collection rather than only filmography-based salary assumptions.
Differences usually come from assumptions, not new evidence. Common drivers include guessing his late-career income, applying different residual or royalty multipliers, valuing real estate using broad averages, and treating spending as negligible or overestimating costs. If a site updates the number without explaining how the assumptions changed and without stating the valuation date, treat it as a re-skinned estimate.
A precise net worth figure is hard to prove publicly because net worth normally requires an estate accounting or probate inventory. The article notes that his papers are archived (Library of Congress), but the publicly available consensus number is still a secondary-source estimate. The practical takeaway is that unless a source cites probate-style documentation or contract/royalty records tied to a specific valuation date, you should treat it as inferred.
For net worth comparisons, assume it means total assets minus debts, not just bank balance. This matters because entertainers can have large illiquid assets (art, collectibles, property) and also owe taxes, agent commissions, or estate-related expenses. A source that only discusses “earnings” without distinguishing assets and liabilities is not measuring net worth in the usual way.
Be strict about identity and time frame. The article highlights confusion with “Vincent P. Price” tied to SEC materials, and it also warns about similarly named individuals. When comparing numbers, confirm the person’s birth and death dates and verify that the estimate is explicitly “at death” (1993 in this case), because the valuation date changes the inflation-adjusted meaning a lot.
Voice and narration can create ongoing payments such as residuals or licensing income, but many net worth sites either assume a generic residual rate or omit it entirely. A helpful check is whether the source mentions residuals, recurring broadcast/licensing income, or an updated residual valuation. If it doesn’t, the $5 million figure is likely based mostly on earlier career earnings rather than a modeled long-tail income stream.
The most common error is landing on pages that are actually about someone else with a similar name, including corporate or SEC-related profiles, or other entertainers with “Vincent Price” in the title. If the page discusses trades, insiders, or business filings, it is not addressing the actor, and the net worth number is irrelevant to him.
Check that it states a valuation date (for example, “at death in 1993”), explains its approach (biography-based career earnings, residual assumptions, or probate-style figures), and distinguishes between assets and spending. Also look for whether it references specific supporting evidence or whether it simply repeats the same consensus figure that other entertainment sites use.
Yes. The article notes that art collection spend could be an asset or a drain depending on market timing. If an estimate does not adjust for the art market conditions around the years he acquired pieces or the prices at the time of estate settlement, it may miss material upside or downside relative to the consensus figure.
It’s useful for rough context, but it’s not a full apples-to-apples comparison. Adjusting for inflation does not account for differences in tax rates, estate settlement costs, residual contract norms, and how celebrity income structures changed over time. Treat inflation adjustment as directional context, not as a precise measure of comparable lifestyle or earning power.
Vinnie Vincent net worth 2026 range, breakdown of earnings, royalties, assets, and why estimates vary plus verification
